AI Attack Surface Mapped. Vulnerabilities Ranked. Remediation Prioritised.

A systematic assessment of your AI applications against OWASP LLM Top 10 — with agent-specific attack surface mapping and a prioritized remediation roadmap.

Duration: 2-3 weeks Team: 1 Senior AI Security Researcher

You might be experiencing...

Your board is asking for an AI risk register. Your team doesn't know where to start.
An enterprise customer sent a security questionnaire that includes AI security controls.
You've deployed LLM-powered features with no security review. A compliance audit is approaching.
You need documented evidence of AI security testing for NESA, DFSA, or VARA regulatory purposes.

Standard penetration testing was designed for web applications, APIs, and network infrastructure. It was not designed for LLM applications, AI agents, or autonomous systems.

An AI application has a fundamentally different attack surface. It processes natural language instructions, executes tool calls based on model output, and makes decisions that can have real-world consequences. The OWASP LLM Top 10 defines the ten most critical vulnerability classes that emerge from this architecture.

What We Test

Our AI Security Assessment systematically evaluates your applications against all ten OWASP LLM vulnerability categories:

  • Prompt injection — can an adversary manipulate your agent’s instructions via user input or data it reads?
  • Insecure output handling — does your application safely handle LLM output before rendering or executing it?
  • Training data poisoning — for custom-trained models, was training data integrity maintained?
  • Excessive agency — do your AI agents have more tool access and permissions than they actually need?
  • Sensitive information disclosure — can the model be induced to reveal training data, system prompts, or sensitive business data?
  • Insecure plugin design — do your LLM plugins and tool integrations follow least-privilege principles?

UAE Regulatory Alignment

NESA, DFSA, and VARA are increasingly referencing AI-specific security controls in their frameworks. Our assessment report is structured to map findings against these regulatory requirements — giving your compliance team the documented evidence they need for regulatory reviews.

Engagement Phases

Week 1

Discovery & Recon

AI stack inventory, threat model, external attack surface enumeration, tool connection mapping, privilege scope assessment.

Week 2

Exploitation & Testing

OWASP LLM Top 10 systematic testing, prompt injection sweeps, tool poisoning simulation, agent hijacking attempts, API security assessment.

Week 3

Reporting

Findings report with CVSS scores, OWASP LLM Top 10 compliance scorecard, attack surface map, prioritized remediation roadmap.

Deliverables

OWASP LLM Top 10 compliance scorecard
AI attack surface map and agent privilege scope diagram
Full technical findings report with CVSS scores
Executive summary for non-technical stakeholders
Prioritized remediation roadmap with effort estimates
Regulatory alignment assessment (NESA, DFSA, VARA as applicable)

Before & After

MetricBeforeAfter
AI Security CoverageNo AI-specific testing — OWASP Top 10 onlyOWASP LLM Top 10 coverage in 2-3 weeks
Regulatory EvidenceNo documented AI security testingCompliance scorecard + findings report for regulators
Time to First FindingsWeeks (traditional assessment)Critical findings within 48 hours of engagement start

Tools We Use

Garak PyRIT Burp Suite Pro Nuclei Amass Claude Code Agents

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OWASP LLM Top 10 cover?

The OWASP LLM Top 10 covers the ten most critical vulnerability classes for Large Language Model applications: prompt injection (LLM01), insecure output handling (LLM02), training data poisoning (LLM03), model denial of service (LLM04), supply chain vulnerabilities (LLM05), sensitive information disclosure (LLM06), insecure plugin design (LLM07), excessive agency (LLM08), overreliance (LLM09), and model theft (LLM10).

Who needs an AI Security Assessment?

Any enterprise that has deployed LLM-powered applications, AI agents, or AI-assisted workflows that interact with business data or make business decisions. This includes customer-facing chatbots, internal AI assistants, automated workflows using LLMs, and any AI feature added to existing applications.

What do we receive at the end?

You receive an OWASP LLM Top 10 compliance scorecard (pass/fail per category with evidence), a full technical findings report with CVSS scores and reproduction steps, an executive summary for leadership, an attack surface map showing all AI components and their connections, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.

How is this different from the Agentic Red Team Exercise?

The AI Security Assessment is a systematic audit against OWASP LLM Top 10 — broader coverage of vulnerability categories, shorter timeframe, focused on compliance evidence. The Agentic Red Team Exercise is a full adversarial simulation using the APEX methodology — deeper, longer, and focused on finding creative attack chains that a systematic audit might miss. Most enterprises start with an assessment and move to a full red team exercise.

Find It Before They Do

Book a free 30-minute security discovery call with our AI Security experts in Dubai, UAE. We identify your highest-risk AI attack vectors — actionable findings in days.

Talk to an Expert